Weedfox788

date ▼ | votes

Examining nine landmark battles from ancient to modern times--from Salamis, where outnumbered Greeks devastated the slave army of Xerxes, to Cortes’s conquest of Mexico to the Tet offensive--Victor Davis Hanson explains why the armies of the West have been the most lethal and effective of any fighting forces in the world.
Looking beyond popular explanations such as geography or superior technology, Hanson argues that it is in fact Western culture and values–the tradition of dissent, the value placed on inventiveness and adaptation, the concept of citizenship–which have consistently produced superior arms and soldiers. Offering riveting battle narratives and a balanced perspective that avoids simple triumphalism, Carnage and Culture demonstrates how armies cannot be separated from the cultures that produce them and explains why an army produced by a free culture will always have the advantage. -Good Reads.
A brilliant history of the rise to global dominance by the West, exploring the links between cultural values and military success.
Instead of weighing up the West through its cultural and literary accomplishments, Hanson engages with the much starker record of the battlefield. In place of The Great Books, he studies The Great Battles. With graphic representations of nine major clashes between West and non-West, Hanson argues that the West has won not just because of technology and military might, but because of its focus on individualism, democratic political structures and scientific rationalism. However, this is no mere Eurocentric account of the steady millennia-long rise of Western power. Rather, it is an explanation of why the West finds itself now militarily unmatched, its values spreading around the globe - sometimes with devastating effects on local cultures.- Google Books

Brilliant history; the best military historian writing. ( )

Hanson's postulates, I believe correctly, the Western ideology of freedom, rational thought, and free expression produces a deadly force when mobilized against a foe. Some argue Hanson discounts the Soviet's in WWII, but during the war the Soviet's had no strategic air power, relying on the British and American bombers. After the invasion of Europe, the Germans kept their strongest and best forces arrayed against western front, especially the American sector. ( )

3852. Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power, by Victor Davis Hanson (read 29 Jan 2004) I read this because John Keegan in his so interesting 3-hour interview on C-SPAN in December said good things about the author. Hanson examines 9 battles between 'Western' and non-Western forces, ranging from Salamis on Sept 28, 480 B.C. through Alexander's victory at Gaugamela (known to Creasy as Arbela) on Oct. 1, 331 B.C., thru Cannae on Aug. 2, 216 B.C., Poitiers on Oct 11, 732, Cortez's victory in Mexico (1520-1521), Lepanto (Oct 7, 1571, Rorke's Drift (Jan 22-23, 1879), Midway (June 4-8, 1942), and Tet in Vietnam in Jan-Feb 1968. Much of what he says makes sense but I did not find his pontificating ad infinitum to be very interesting at times, and while I will read more John Keegan I have no present intention to read any more by Victor Davis Hanson even though he has the three names necessary for a serious historian. ( )

Hanson's domain is Greek warfare. Whenever he strays from it, be it modern politics or, in this case, general military history, his bias limits the quality of his research. He certainly can write and his books are pleasant reads. But his methodology (and thus his results) are deeply flawed. Such 'analysis' by Hanson's political friends has resulted in enough carnage in East and West. Readers beware.
Historians have identified ocean-going ships and guns as the inventions that catapulted the West to dominance. This parsimony does not suit Hanson who likes to see (and finds) a cultural dominance. His catalogue of Western assets (paradigms of freedom, decisive shock battle, civic militarism, technology, capitalism, individualism, civilian audit and open dissent) and his nine data points (spanning more than 2.000 years) only show his bias. Since when can one speak of Greek and Roman capitalists? How did the galley slaves at Lepanto express their freedom of speech?
For each and every example he lists, there exists a counter example -- both for supposed Westerness and his cases. His beloved Greeks were subjugated by Macedon barbarians. The Late Roman Westerners were crushed by Eastern hordes. Byzantium succumbed to the very civilized Ottoman Empire. The Japanese defeated the Russians in 1905. The Vietnamese whipped the French and the USA. When his thesis does not hold, Hanson retreats to the formulation that defeat only happened at the fringes of Western empires. What about the barbarians in Rome? The muslims in Spain? The Ottomans in Hungary? They don't suit Hanson's cultural supremacy idea and thus are not discussed. 'Git there fastest with the mostest' and 'firepower wins' remain better explanations. Read it for intellectual amusement. ( )

Audible(0 editions)

Project Gutenberg(0 editions)